Home / Services / Infrastructure & Cloud
Infrastructure & Cloud

Infrastructure and cloud built around the workloads you actually run

Not every workload belongs in the cloud, and not every server belongs on-premises. We help you decide where each workload should run across Azure, Azure Local, Nutanix and your own infrastructure, then design, migrate and operate it.

Operate across
Azure · Microsoft 365 · Entra ID · Azure Local · Nutanix · Hybrid infrastructure
Cloud and infrastructure services

Infrastructure refresh, cloud migration and workload placement

Most conversations start with one pressure: ageing hardware, a VMware renewal, a stalled migration, rising cloud costs or doubts about recovery.

Infrastructure Refresh

Infrastructure Refresh is for organisations with ageing servers, VMware exit, unsupported hardware, backup uncertainty or HCI decisions.

It isn't only about replacing hardware. It's about deciding which workloads still need local infrastructure, which should move to cloud, and what can be retired. The work can include:

Server replacementVMware transitionAzure LocalNutanixBackup architectureRecovery design
Best when servers or VMware are at end of lifeExplore Infrastructure Refresh →
Managed Cloud and Migration

Managed Cloud and Migration is for organisations moving workloads, users, data or access into a better cloud or hybrid model. The real question isn't what can move, but what should move, in what order, under which identity model, and with what backup and recovery design.

The work can include:

Azure migrationMicrosoft 365Entra IDIdentity and accessConditional AccessDevice complianceGovernanceBackupCost visibilityMonitoring

A migration isn't complete when workloads are online. The environment still needs to be operated after cutover.

Best when workloads are moving to Azure or M365Explore Managed Cloud and Migration →
Workload Placement

Workload Placement is for organisations that need to make better decisions before committing to cloud migration, hardware refresh, VMware exit or another platform direction.

It starts with workload behaviour:

PerformanceLatencyData sizeDependencyUser accessRecovery requirementLicensingCost

Some workloads belong in Azure or Microsoft 365, some are better kept local, and some are best retired. This step prevents refreshing hardware for workloads that should move, or moving workloads that should have stayed local.

Best before you commit to a platformExplore Workload Placement →
The operating view

We design cloud, servers and recovery as one decision

We plan infrastructure and cloud together, because your users, identity and backups already span both.

Users work across Microsoft 365, SaaS, cloud applications and local systems. Identity controls access across both. Backup and recovery depend on understanding dependencies across platforms. Cost can drift in cloud while local infrastructure still carries critical workloads. A VMware exit can reshape the cloud and infrastructure path. A cloud migration can expose weak identity, backup and governance.

FOUNDATIONEntra ID · Backup and recovery · Cost governanceFinance and project systemsBIM and design filesMicrosoft 365 appsAgeing local appWORKLOAD PLACEMENTBehaviour · accessPerformance · dataBackup · costSequence · riskAzure and Microsoft 365Azure Local and NutanixRetire or replaceWORKLOADSRIGHT PLATFORM
How we place workloads: the platform follows the workloadOn one foundation of identity, backup and cost
Destination 01

Cloud

Once workloads move to Azure, someone has to run them: monitoring, access, cost and change. We plan that before the move.

Explore Managed Cloud and Migration →
Destination 02

Local infrastructure

Servers, VMware, Azure Local, Nutanix, storage, local applications and site-dependent workloads need to be assessed on performance, ease of support, recovery and cost.

Explore Infrastructure Refresh →
Design dependency

Recovery

Cloud, local systems and Microsoft 365 data have to come back together after an incident, so we design recovery around application dependencies and prove it with restore testing.

Explore Backup and Disaster Recovery →
Capability at a glance

Cloud and infrastructure at a glance

20+
workloads to Azure Local
VMware exit and migration to Azure Local for PPK Mining Equipment, with backup and recovery aligned to the new platform.
Hybrid Azure
delivery
Azure, Microsoft 365, Entra ID, SharePoint, Exchange Online, Teams, OneDrive, Azure Virtual Desktop, Intune, Azure Backup and Microsoft Defender.
Azure Local
and Nutanix
Platform options assessed for organisations that still need local infrastructure, predictable performance, private cloud capability or stronger workload control.
VMware
transition planning
Infrastructure refresh and platform review for organisations facing VMware exit, ageing hosts, HCI decisions or staged workload movement.
Workload placement

Move to cloud, keep local, retire or replace, based on workload behaviour, latency, data size, dependency, recovery, licensing, cost and ease of support.

Backup and recovery dependencies

Recovery dependencies considered before migration, refresh or hybrid design is finalised.

Cloud cost and governance

Cost, access and monitoring planned before the move and managed after it.

Managed cloud operations

Azure, Microsoft 365, identity, backup, monitoring, documentation and support responsibilities operated after cutover.

Common starting points

What usually prompts the conversation

Most cloud and infrastructure work begins with one visible pressure point. The useful work is understanding what else is connected before the workload direction is locked in.

01Ageing servers and infrastructure lifecycleInfrastructure Refresh or Workload Placement

Hosts age, firmware falls behind, support becomes harder, backup assumptions become older, and recovery confidence weakens. A refresh should clarify which workloads still need local infrastructure, which should move to cloud, what can be retired and what recovery position the business needs.

Best fit: Infrastructure Refresh or Workload Placement →
02VMware exit and platform pressureInfrastructure Refresh

A VMware exit can quickly reshape the hybrid model. The question is what the workloads need, what the business can operate, what the support model requires and whether alternatives such as Azure Local, Nutanix or cloud migration are appropriate.

Best fit: Infrastructure Refresh →
03Cloud migration uncertaintyManaged Cloud and Migration or Workload Placement

We turn "move to the cloud" into a specific plan: which workloads move, in what order, under which identity model, with what backup and recovery design, and under which cost governance.

Best fit: Managed Cloud and Migration or Workload Placement →
04Microsoft 365 growth without governanceManaged Cloud and Migration

Microsoft 365 often becomes where the business runs before anyone owns how it's set up. We sort out permissions, sharing, retention and identity. The environment needs stronger structure around identity, access, data, backup, administration and lifecycle.

Best fit: Managed Cloud and Migration →
05Cloud cost driftManaged Cloud and Migration

Cost drifts when services are created without ownership, workloads are oversized, reserved capacity isn't planned, or the business lacks clear reporting. We build cost control into managed cloud from day one: rightsizing, clear owners and regular reviews.

Best fit: Managed Cloud and Migration →
06Identity, access and security foundation gapsManaged Cloud and Migration

Entra ID, Conditional Access, MFA, administrator roles, device compliance, privileged access, backup access and monitoring all affect how safely the environment can be moved, refreshed and operated. Every future decision depends on this foundation.

Best fit: Managed Cloud and Migration →
Workload placement

The platform follows the workload

Not everything belongs in cloud, not every VMware exit needs a full platform replacement, and not every migration should start before identity, backup and cost governance are ready. The decision depends on the workload and the environment around it.

Move to cloud when cloud improves the operating model
Cloud may be right when the workload benefits from Azure, Microsoft 365, improved access, scalability, reduced hardware dependency, better integration, stronger governance or a better support model. But moving should still be planned against identity, access, backup, recovery, monitoring, cost and application dependency.
Keep local when performance, dependency or recovery requires it
Some workloads still need local infrastructure, because of latency, large file performance, operational dependency, site-based access, data volume, integration, predictable access, recovery design or cost. Azure Local, Nutanix or refreshed servers may be the correct answer when the business genuinely needs local performance and control.
Retire or replace when migration preserves the wrong thing
Some systems should not be migrated or refreshed. They may be outdated, poorly supported, duplicated, underused, too expensive to maintain or already replaceable through Microsoft 365, SaaS or a better business application. A good review identifies what no longer deserves another platform cycle.
Sequence change around the business risk
The order matters. A refresh may need to happen before migration. A cloud move may reduce the local refresh size. Identity may need to be fixed before either. Backup and recovery may need to be improved before a platform is changed. Sequencing should reduce risk, not simply follow the easiest technical path.

Architecture before migration. Every workload where it serves the business best.

How we work

How we work

We start with how people actually use the systems, then shape the platform around them: how users get in, how workloads behave, how Microsoft 365 and Azure are run, how restores work and what it all costs afterwards.

01
Understand the environment
Review workloads, users, applications, Microsoft 365, Azure, Entra ID, local infrastructure, VMware, backup, recovery, licensing, cost, documentation and ownership.
02
Identify the pressure points
Separate ageing infrastructure, VMware exit, migration uncertainty, Microsoft 365 governance gaps, backup gaps, cost drift, identity weaknesses and support issues.
03
Define the platform direction
Clarify whether the next step is Infrastructure Refresh, Managed Cloud and Migration, Workload Placement, VMware transition, Azure Local or Nutanix.
04
Design before change
Set the architecture, identity model, workload placement, platform direction, backup design, recovery sequence, cost model and support approach before migration or refresh begins.
05
Operate and improve
Document, monitor, manage cost, review access, maintain backup, test recovery, coordinate vendors and keep the environment easy to support after change.
Why Inlight IT

Why clients trust us with platform decisions

Cloud and infrastructure work goes wrong when it's treated only as a platform move. A migration finishes but can't be governed. A refresh replaces hardware without improving recovery. A VMware exit reduces licensing cost but creates a new support problem. We connect assessment, design, migration, refresh and support so the environment can be operated after the change.

01

We recommend less change when that is right

Sometimes the right recommendation is to do less than expected. We'll tell you when the platform should stay simpler, or when a workload should stay exactly where it is. We're looking for the project the environment actually needs, not the biggest one.

02

Assessment, design, migration and support are connected

The people who design the change also support what comes after it, so the reasoning isn't lost at handover.

03

We connect the platform to everything around it

Platform decisions sit beside Entra ID, Conditional Access, device compliance, backup, recovery, endpoint protection, monitoring and vendor escalation. The cloud and infrastructure path is never decided in isolation.

04

Local infrastructure still has a role

Local infrastructure isn't automatically legacy. Azure Local, Nutanix, refreshed servers and hybrid infrastructure can be the right answer when workloads need local performance, predictable access, recovery control or site-dependent operations.

05

We support the operating model after change

The environment needs to be monitored, patched, documented, recovered and improved after the change. We design with that in mind from the start.

06

Straight answers for leadership

We show leadership what should move, what should stay, where money is leaking and where recovery needs work, in plain language and on one page.

Common questions

Cloud and infrastructure questions

What is included in Cloud and Infrastructure services?

Cloud and Infrastructure services can include cloud migration, infrastructure refresh, workload placement, Azure and Microsoft 365 administration, hybrid cloud design, backup and recovery planning, identity integration, monitoring, documentation and ongoing operational support.

How do we decide between Azure, Azure Local, Nutanix and refreshed local infrastructure?

The right platform depends on the workload, not the trend. Some systems suit Azure because they need cloud scale, remote access, integration with Microsoft 365 or reduced dependency on ageing hardware. Other workloads may need Azure Local, Nutanix or refreshed local infrastructure because of performance, latency, data size, licensing, application dependencies, recovery requirements or operational control.

What should be reviewed before a cloud migration?

Before a migration, we review what you actually run: workloads, applications and their dependencies, identity, data, security, backup, licensing and network paths, and who looks after each.

This avoids moving existing problems into a new platform, and clarifies what should migrate, stay local, be replaced or be retired.

How do backup and recovery dependencies affect platform decisions?

Backup and recovery can materially change the right platform decision. A workload may be technically suitable for cloud, but recovery time, recovery point, data volume, identity dependency, application dependency or restore complexity may make a different architecture more appropriate.

Recovery planning should consider Microsoft 365 backup, Azure Backup, immutable backup, local infrastructure recovery, identity recovery, administrator access, restore testing, RTO, RPO and the sequence required to bring systems back online. Platform decisions should not be finalised until recovery dependencies are understood.

Where does VMware transition fit into Cloud and Infrastructure planning?

VMware transition usually sits inside a broader infrastructure and workload placement review. It isn't only a renewal or replacement question. We look at it alongside core-based licensing, hardware age, support contracts, host capacity, backup and application dependencies.

The outcome may be a VMware refresh, migration to Azure, use of Azure Local, movement to Nutanix, replacement of specific workloads, or a staged hybrid approach. The important point is to avoid treating VMware transition as a product swap when it may be an opportunity to simplify, retire or re-platform parts of the environment.

Is cloud always better than on-premises infrastructure?

No. Cloud can be the right answer for many workloads, especially where remote access, scalability, Microsoft integration, resilience or reduced hardware dependency matter. But some workloads are better kept on local infrastructure or private cloud because of performance, latency, data size, specialised systems, cost, licensing or recovery requirements.

What is the difference between cloud migration and infrastructure refresh?

Cloud migration moves selected workloads, data or services into a cloud platform such as Azure or Microsoft 365. Infrastructure refresh updates or replaces local platforms such as servers, storage, virtualisation, backup, switching or private cloud.

In practice, the two decisions often overlap. A refresh may reveal that some workloads should move to cloud, while others should remain local. A cloud migration may reveal that identity, backup, networking or retained local systems still need attention. We treat migration and refresh as one decision, because they usually are.

What happens after the cloud or infrastructure project is complete?

After migration or refresh, the environment still needs to be operated. That includes monitoring, patching, backup checks, restore testing, identity administration, access control, documentation, vendor coordination, cost review, security review and support escalation.

Work with Inlight IT

Planning a platform decision?

Tell us what's driving the change: a server refresh, VMware exit, Azure migration or cloud cost drift.

Prefer email? contact@inlightit.com.au